Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Anchor | green | “is granted only when the movant demonstrates that the complaint has failed to include 'enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 10 |
| 2 | Rivell v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc. | green | “in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 5 |
| 3 | Settoon Towing, L.L.C. v. Marquette Transportation Co. | green | “courts cannot, without any textual warrant, expand the operation of savings clauses to modify the scope of displacement under opa.” | 3 |
| 4 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “detailed scheme . . . preempts the general oil-removal remedies that might've been available under . . . the common law.” | 3 |
| 5 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “even if the opa may not itself contain a waiver of sovereign immunity, vessel owners may still go after the united states for removal costs and damages by bringing common-law admiralty claims against the government pursuant to the saa's sovereign-immunity waiver.” | 3 |
| 6 | Savage Services Corporation v. United States | green | “fragmented collection of federal and state laws providing inadequate cleanup and damage remedies.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. American Commercial Lines, L.L.C | green | “preemption refers to whether federal statutory law supersedes state law, while 'displacement' applies when . . . a federal statute governs a question previously governed by federal common law.” | 3 |
| 8 | Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. | green | “that the opa 'does not preempt state law in the area of oil spill liability and compensation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.