Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nordlinger v. Hahn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nordlinger v. Hahn Anchor | green | “actually articulate at any time the purpose or rationale supporting its classification.” | 14 |
| 2 | Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. | green | “to negative every conceivable basis which might support” | 12 |
| 3 | Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. | green | “the burden is on the one attacking the legislative arrangement to negative every conceivable basis which might support it.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.