Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ethel Harmon v. Eric Holder, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ethel Harmon v. Eric Holder, Jr. Anchor | green | “where, as here, the bia issues its own decision rather than summarily affirming the ij, the bia decision is reviewed as the final agency decision, but the ij's decision is also reviewed to the extent that the bia adopted it.” | 21 |
| 2 | Bonilla-Morales v. Holder | green | “a person who is unable or unwilling to return to her home country because of past persecution or a 'well-founded fear' of future persecution 'on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bonilla-Morales v. Holder | green | “an alien who seeks asylum must establish that she meets the definition of a 'refugee,' which means a person who is unable or unwilling to return to her home country because of past persecution or a 'well-founded fear' of future persecution 'on account of race, religion, national…” | 4 |
| 4 | Ramaj v. Gonzales | green | “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.