Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Paul Burritt v. Lisa Ditlefsen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul Burritt v. Lisa Ditlefsen Anchor | green | “the general rule, when the federal claims fall out before trial, is that the district court should relinquish jurisdiction over any supplemental . . . state law claims in order to minimize federal judicial intrusion into matters of purely state law.” | 11 |
| 2 | United Food & Commercial Workers Unions & Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Walgreen Co. | green | “having failed to plead facts that would establish a violation of section 1962(c), the plaintiff cannot state a claim for conspiracy under section 1962(d) based on those same facts.” | 7 |
| 3 | Midwest Grinding Company, Inc. v. Spitz | green | “to eradicate organized, long-term criminal activity.” | 6 |
| 4 | Katie Arsberry v. State of Illinois | green | “which is based on historical antipathy to rate setting by courts . . . and on a policy forbidding price discrimination by public utilities and common carriers, forbids a court to revise a public utility's or . . . common carrier's filed tariff, which is to say the terms of sale …” | 3 |
| 5 | Empress Casino Joliet Corpora v. John Johnston | green | “simple logrolling . . . falls short of evidence that could support a rico claim.” | 3 |
| 6 | Edward Leo v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC of Del | green | “once the rate is filed with the appropriate regulatory body, we have no ability to effectively reduce it by awarding damages for an alleged overcharge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.