Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Good Shepherd Manor Foundation, Inc. v. City Of Momence.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Good Shepherd Manor Foundation, Inc. v. City Of Momence Anchor | green | “expert testimony as to legal conclusions that will determine the outcome of the case is inadmissible.” | 27 |
| 2 | United States v. John Sinclair | green | “cannot testify about legal issues on which the judge will instruct the jury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.