Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Venegas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Venegas Anchor | green | “even if each error standing alone would be harmless.” | 7 |
| 2 | State v. Venegas | green | “even if each error standing alone would be harmless.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Venegas | green | “under the cumulative error doctrine, we may reverse a defendant's conviction when the combined effect of errors during trial effectively denied the defendant their right to a fair trial, even if each error standing alone would be harmless.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Venegas | green | “under the cumulative error doctrine, we may reverse a defendant's conviction when the combined effect of errors during trial effectively denied the defendant their right to a fair trial, even if each error standing alone would be harmless.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Venegas | green | “the doctrine does not apply where the errors are few and have little or no effect on the trial's outcome.” | 5 |
| 6 | State v. Venegas | green | “under the cumulative error doctrine,an appellate court may reverse a defendant's conviction when the combined effect of errors during trial effectively denied the defendantof his or her right to a fair trial, even if each error standing alone would be harmless.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.