Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richardson v. Richardson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richardson v. Richardson Anchor | green | “the determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the family court, and that court's determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if supported by the record” | 27 |
| 2 | Matter of Shank v. Shank | green | “supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.