Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weil v. . Herring.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weil v. . Herring Anchor | green | “the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount” | 17 |
| 2 | Parrish v. Bryant | green | “the theory upon which a case is tried in the lower court must prevail in considering the appeal and interpreting the record and determining the validity of the exceptions.” | 4 |
| 3 | Matter of Peirce | green | “recording machines in lieu of a court reporter,” | 3 |
| 4 | Weil v. . Herring | green | “an examination of the record discloses that the cause was not tried upon that theory, and the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount on appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.