Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Jones Anchor | green | “our standard of review in addressing a challenge to the denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” | 11 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Harlan | green | “the evidence presented at the suppression hearing when examining a ruling on a pre-trial motion to suppress.” | 8 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Jones | green | “a challenge to the denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” | 7 |
| 4 | COM. EX REL. TEJADA v. Beard | neutral | “the evidence of the commonwealth and so much of the evidence for the defense as remains uncontradicted when read in context of the record as a whole.” | 4 |
| 5 | Com. v. Barnes, Q. | green | “is limited to the evidentiary record that was created at the suppression hearing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.