Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Hayles.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Hayles Anchor | green | “state-agent immunity protects state employees, as agents of the state, in the exercise of their judgment in executing their work responsibilities.” | 19 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Estate of Reynolds | green | “if the state agent makes such a showing, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to show that the state agent acted willfully, maliciously, fraudulently, in bad faith, or beyond his or her authority.” | 9 |
| 3 | Ex Parte City of Tuskegee | green | “the restatement of state-agent immunity as set out in cranman, 792 so.2d at 405 , now governs the determination of whether a peace officer is entitled to immunity under 6-5-338(a).” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.