Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Green v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green v. State Anchor | green | “in conducting plain error review, we must examine whether there was error, whether the error was plain or clear, and whether the error affected the defendant's substantial rights.” | 11 |
| 2 | McKenna v. State | green | “failure to object to or request a jury instruction precludes appellate review, unless the error is patently prejudicial and requires the court to act sua sponte to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial.” | 6 |
| 3 | Meyer v. State | green | “a denial of a motion for a new trial based upon juror misconduct will be upheld absent an abuse of discretion by the district court.” | 5 |
| 4 | SALETTA v. State | green | “failure to object generally precludes appellate review.” | 4 |
| 5 | Gallego v. State | green | “if it is plain and affected the defendant's substantial rights.” | 4 |
| 6 | Bonin v. Vasquez | green | “the need for an instruction must be analyzed in light of the circumstances of the case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.