Topic: traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #11751

8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co. Anchor
ny · 2000
green “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” 8
2 LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.
ny · 2000
green “prospect of defending this action . . . comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” 6
3 Ying Jun Chen v. Lei Shi
nyappdiv · 2005
green “need only demonstrate that facts 'may exist' to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant” 4
4 George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz
ny · 1977
green “transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state.” 3
5 Cornely v. Dynamic HVAC Supply, LLC
nyappdiv · 2007
green “need only make a prima facie showing” 3
6 Roldan v. Dexter Folder Co.
nyappdiv · 1991
green “need only make a prima facie showing that personal jurisdiction exists” 3
7 Porter v. LSB Industries, Inc.
nyappdiv · 1993
green “factors that are intrinsic to the parent-subsidiary relationship and, by themselves, are not determinative” 3
8 Carpino v. National Store Fixtures, Inc.
nyappdiv · 2000
green “expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check