Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Graham v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham v. State Anchor | green | “it is the role of the jury to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses, and the resolution of such conflicts adversely to the defendant does not render the evidence insufficient.” | 16 |
| 2 | Graham v. State | green | “adversely to the defendant does not render the evidence insufficient.” | 9 |
| 3 | Wright v. State | green | “it is for the jury to resolve conflicts in the evidence and questions of witness credibility, not this court.” | 3 |
| 4 | Graham v. State | green | “the resolution of such conflicts adversely to the defendant does not render the evidence insufficient.” | 3 |
| 5 | Reddick v. State | green | “the failure to give a requested charge which is authorized by the evidence can be harmless error.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.