Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kiersten Taylor-Novotny v. Health Alliance Medical Plans.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiersten Taylor-Novotny v. Health Alliance Medical Plans Anchor | green | “an employer is generally permitted to treat regular attendance as an essential job requirement and need not accommodate erratic or unreliable attendance.” | 5 |
| 2 | Gratzl v. Office of Chief Judges of the 12th, 18th, 19th and 22nd Judicial Circuits | green | “prove that she was qualified for her current job simply by citing evidence that she was qualified for a previous job, with different essential functions, that had been eliminated.” | 4 |
| 3 | Miller v. Illinois Department of Transportation | green | “miller's request for reasonable accommodation did not ask the employer to do anything it was not already doing.” | 4 |
| 4 | Miller v. Illinois Department of Transportation | green | “to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities.” | 4 |
| 5 | Miller v. Illinois Department of Transportation | green | “the ada does not give employers unfettered discretion to decide what is reasonable.” | 4 |
| 6 | Heidi Hostettler v. College of Wooster | green | “fulltime pres ence at work is not an essential function of a job simply be cause an employer says that it is.” | 4 |
| 7 | Brown v. Smith | green | “erratic or unreliable attendance” | 4 |
| 8 | Brown v. Smith | green | “the ada does not give employers unfettered discretion to decide what is reasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.