Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dayomic Jackie Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dayomic Jackie Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia Anchor | green | “when the appellant fails to ensure that the record contains transcripts or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues, any assignments of error affected by such omission will not be considered.” | 9 |
| 2 | Robinson v. Robinson | green | “the burden is upon the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record which substantiates the claim of error.” | 8 |
| 3 | Neima Bormey v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “that ssi benefits be paid only to the extent an individual's minimum income level is not being met from other sources.” | 3 |
| 4 | Bennett v. COM., DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “independent financial resource” | 3 |
| 5 | Bennett v. COM., DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “noncustodial parent's child support obligation is not impacted by the receipt of ssi on the behalf of a disabled child.” | 3 |
| 6 | Harmon v. Peery | green | “dicta are opinions of a judge which do not embody the resolution or determination of the court and, are made without argument or full consideration of the point . . . .” | 3 |
| 7 | Harmon v. Peery | green | “obiter dicta are such opinions uttered by the way, not upon the point or question pending, as if turning aside, from the main topic of the case to collateral subjects.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.