Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Lopez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Lopez Anchor | green | “casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” | 13 |
| 2 | People v. Smith | green | “defendant's alford plea was 'the product of a voluntary and rational choice, and the record before the court contains strong evidence of actual guilt” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Smith | green | “the record establishes that defendant's alford plea was 'the product of a voluntary and rational choice, and the record before the court contains strong evidence of actual guilt” | 3 |
| 4 | DiPaolo v. Avery | green | “no factual colloquy was required inasmuch as defendant pleaded guilty to a crime lesser than that charged” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Sanborn | green | “during the plea colloquy, county court conflated the appeal waiver with the rights automatically waived by the guilty plea” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Alfieri | green | “shows that defendant was advised of his rights and that his alford plea . . . was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered with a full understanding of its consequences” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Pastor | green | “defendant said nothing during the plea colloquy or the sentencing proceeding that negated an element of the crime or raised the possibility of a justification defense” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.