Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loughry v. Lincoln First Bank, N. A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loughry v. Lincoln First Bank, N. A. Anchor | green | “a superior officer in the course of employment orders, participates in, or ratifies” | 5 |
| 2 | Frackson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. | green | “although states possess considerable discretion over the imposition of punitive damages, the united states supreme court has emphasized that there are constitutional limitations on such awards, and that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment prohibits the imposition …” | 5 |
| 3 | Regan v. Long Island Rail Road | green | “when comparing injuries and awards, it is incumbent upon us to consider not only the type of injury and the level of pain, but the period of time for which that pain is being calculated” | 5 |
| 4 | Ramos v. La Montana Moving & Storage, Inc. | green | “excruciating crushing injuries” | 5 |
| 5 | McIntyre v. Manhattan Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. | green | “it is the duty of the court to keep a verdict for punitive damages within reasonable bounds considering the purpose to be achieved as well as the mala fides of the defendant in the particular case” | 5 |
| 6 | Donlon v. City of New York | green | “if it deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation” | 5 |
| 7 | Donlon v. City of New York | green | “deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.