Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gebbia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gebbia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc Anchor | green | “the jurisdictional facts that support removal must be judged at the time of the removal.” | 27 |
| 2 | In Re Hot-Hed Inc. | green | “where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of 75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between ... citizens of different states,” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.