Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Lands Council v. McNair.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Lands Council v. McNair Anchor | green | “review under the arbitrary and capricious standard 'is narrow, and we do not substitute our judgment for that of the agency.” | 8 |
| 2 | Neighbors Of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander | green | “in contrast to nfma, nepa exists to ensure a process, not to mandate particular results.” | 6 |
| 3 | Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest Service | green | “rather, we will reverse a decision as arbitrary and capricious only if the agency relied on factors congress did not intend it to consider, 'entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem,' or offered an explanation 'that runs counter to the evidence before the a…” | 6 |
| 4 | Wildwest Institute v. Bull | green | “may aggregate its cumulative effects analysis pursuant to 40 c.f.r. 1508.7 ,” | 4 |
| 5 | WILDWEST INSTITUTE v. Castaneda | green | “rather, such a practice is merely recommended when possible.” | 4 |
| 6 | WILDWEST INSTITUTE v. Castaneda | green | “to the extent wildwest attempts to challenge forest-wide management practices on the coattails of the nine challenged logging projects, its suit is generally permitted.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.