Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission Anchor | green | “the simple interest in providing voters with additional relevant information does not justify a state requirement that a writer make statements or disclosures she would otherwise omit.” | 12 |
| 2 | Doe v. Reed | green | “the strength of the governmental interest must reflect the seriousness of the actual burden on first amendment rights.” | 12 |
| 3 | Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta | green | “a substantial relation between the disclosure requirement and a sufficiently important governmental interest.” | 5 |
| 4 | Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of State | green | “a directive to the legislature to formulate the process by which initiative petitioned legislation shall reach the legislature or the electorate.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.