Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay Anchor | green | “experience and specialized competence of the agency” | 6 |
| 2 | Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay | green | “deference is not abdication, and it requires us to accept only those principles of agency interpretations that are reasonable in light of the principles of construction courts normally employ.” | 6 |
| 3 | Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia Real Estate Board | green | “without determining principle.” | 5 |
| 4 | Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth | green | “the circuit court has no authority under vapa to reweigh the facts in the agency's evidentiary record.” | 3 |
| 5 | Turner v. Jackson | green | “merely substitute its own independent judgment for that of the body entrusted by the legislature with the administrative function.” | 3 |
| 6 | Avalon Assisted Living Facilities, Inc. v. Zager | green | “to the interpretation of regulations adopted by an administrative agency pursuant to statutory authority granted it by the legislature.” | 3 |
| 7 | 1st Stop Health Services, Inc., etc. v. Department of Medical Assistance Services, etc. | green | “the regulations warn providers that 'noncompliance with dmas policies and procedures may result in a retraction of medicaid payment or termination of the provider agreement, or both.” | 3 |
| 8 | 1st Stop Health Services, Inc., etc. v. Department of Medical Assistance Services, etc. | green | “would ignore the plain terms of the provider agreement and the manual, incentivize sloppy recordkeeping, and increase the cost and complexity of audits.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.