Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Wesley Bowman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Wesley Bowman Anchor | green | “(1) the nature and seriousness of the misconduct; (2) the extent to which the comments were invited by the defense; (3) the extent to which any prejudice was ameliorated by the court's instruction to the jury; (4) the defense's opportunity to counter any prejudice; and (5) the w…” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Gregory Wolfe | green | “reflects reasonable inferences from the evidence adduced at trial rather than personal opinion” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Yulia Abair | green | “close cases are resolved in favor of upholding the judge's exercise of discretion to control the admission of evidence at trial; reversal is appropriate only if no reasonable judge would make the same decision.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Eric Bloom | green | “we review for abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a new trial based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct.” | 5 |
| 5 | Derrick Searcy v. Danny D. Jaimet, Warden, Hill Correctional Center | green | “the opportunity to show that a witness is biased, or that the testimony is exaggerated or unbelievable.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Yulia Abair | green | “broad discretion to permit or exclude cross examination.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Eric Bloom | green | “determine whether the prosecu tor's conduct was improper in itself.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.