Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nathson Fields v. Lawrence Wharrie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nathson Fields v. Lawrence Wharrie Anchor | green | “the fabrication of evidence harmed the defendant before and not just during the trial, because it was used to help indict him.” | 12 |
| 2 | William Avery v. City of Milwaukee | green | “convictions premised on deliberately falsified evidence will always violate the defendant's right to due process.” | 7 |
| 3 | Jeffrey Reed v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, John Griffin, Detective, W. Murphy, Detective | green | “the chain of causation is broken by an indictment, absent an allegation of pressure or influence exerted by the police officers, or knowing misstatements made by the officers to the prosecutor.” | 6 |
| 4 | William Hurt v. Matthew Wise | green | “the fabrication of evidence harmed the defendant before and not just during the trial, because it was used to help indict him.” | 4 |
| 5 | Bianchi v. McQueen | green | “just because a prosecutor was involved in a case in an investigatory role does not mean that he is deprived of immunity for what he did as a prosecutor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.