Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Knowlton v. WOOD RIVER MEDICAL CENTER.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knowlton v. WOOD RIVER MEDICAL CENTER Anchor | green | “when reviewing a decision by the industrial commission, this court exercises free review over the commission's conclusions of law, but will not disturb the commission's factual findings if they are supported by substantial and competent evidence.” | 9 |
| 2 | McNulty v. Sinclair Oil Corp. | green | “substantial and competent evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.” | 6 |
| 3 | Knowlton v. WOOD RIVER MEDICAL CENTER | green | “the commission's conclusions regarding the credibility and weight of evidence will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.” | 5 |
| 4 | Flowers v. SHENANGO SCREENPRINTING, INC. | green | “(1) whether the commission correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion, (2) whether it acted within the outer boundaries of its discretion and consistently with the legal standards applicable to the specific choices available to it, and (3) whether it reached its decision…” | 4 |
| 5 | Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | green | “substantial and competent evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.” | 4 |
| 6 | Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | green | “idaho code 72-804 permits the award of attorney fees if it is determined that an employer or its surety contested a workers' compensation claim without reasonable ground.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.