Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp. Anchor | green | “a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 22 |
| 2 | Trident Construction Corp. v. West Electric, Inc. | green | “where the trial court, sitting without a jury, makes a determination predicated upon conflicting evidence, that determination will not be disturbed on appeal where supported by substantial evidence.” | 7 |
| 3 | State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp. | green | “substantial evidence has been defined as that which 'a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.