Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Star Insurance v. Risk Marketing Group Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Star Insurance v. Risk Marketing Group Inc. Anchor | green | “the fact that some aspects of an order are immediately appealable does not alter the inter- locutory nature of the district court's decision.” | 5 |
| 2 | City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc. and State of Indiana | green | “the offending provision is not severable, and the whole statute must be stricken.” | 5 |
| 3 | City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc. and State of Indiana | green | “whether the statute can stand on its own without the invalid provision, and whether the legislature intended the remainder of the statute to stand if the invalid provision is severed.” | 5 |
| 4 | Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc. | green | “constitutional litigation is not a game of gotcha ... where litigants can ride a discrete constitutional flaw in a stat- ute to take down the whole, otherwise constitutional stat- ute.” | 5 |
| 5 | Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc. | green | “what is the point of fighting this long battle ... if the prize for winning is no relief at all?” | 5 |
| 6 | Gregory Ruggles v. Jacqueline Ruggles | green | “a matter is moot if it be- comes impossible for a federal court to provide 'any effectual relief' to the plaintiff.” | 5 |
| 7 | City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc. and State of Indiana | green | “whether the legislature intended the remainder of the statute to stand if the invalid provision is severed.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.