Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLE.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLE Anchor | green | “an abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court are either controlled by an error of law or are based on unsupported factual conclusions.” | 10 |
| 2 | Jackson v. Speed | green | “(1) the nature, extent, and difficulty of the case; (2) the time necessarily devoted to the case; (3) professional standing of counsel; (4) contingency of compensation; (5) beneficial results obtained; and (6) customary legal fees for similar services.” | 8 |
| 3 | Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLE | green | “the decision to award or deny attorneys' fees under a state statute will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” | 8 |
| 4 | Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLE | green | “similarly, the specific amount of attorneys' fees awarded pursuant to a statute authorizing reasonable attorneys' fees is left to the discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.