Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Barnes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Barnes Anchor | green | “in reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, giving the state the benefit of all reasonable inferences.” | 11 |
| 2 | State v. Barnes | green | “in the light most favorable to the state, giving the state the benefit of all reasonable inferences.” | 9 |
| 3 | State v. Thomas | green | “it is for the jury to decide whether the facts, taken singly or in combination, satisfy them beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is actually guilty.” | 8 |
| 4 | State v. Lee | green | “evidence which a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.