Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Graff Chevrolet Co. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graff Chevrolet Co. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Board Anchor | green | “some reasonable basis exists in the record for the agency's action.” | 13 |
| 2 | Graff Chevrolet Co. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Board | green | “the agency's action is such that reasonable minds could have reached the conclusion the agency must have reached in order to justify its action.” | 9 |
| 3 | Flores v. Employees Retirement System of Texas | green | “an occupational trauma is the direct cause of the employee's disability without regard to a preexisting mental or physical condition.” | 5 |
| 4 | Graff Chevrolet Co. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Board | green | “test an agency's findings, inferences, conclusions, and decisions to determine whether they are reasonably supported by substantial evidence considering the reliable and probative evidence in the record as a whole.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.