Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Chicago v. Jefferson B. Sessions III.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Chicago v. Jefferson B. Sessions III Anchor | green | “is essential to achieve the city's goals of protecting life and property, preventing crime and resolving problems.” | 4 |
| 2 | City of Philadelphia v. Attorney General United States | green | “not urging that the attorney general has discretion to select applicable laws; rather, congress has made laws applicable to chicago, and chicago must comply with them.” | 4 |
| 3 | City of Philadelphia v. Attorney General United States | green | “nothing in this chapter or any other act shall be construed to authorize” | 4 |
| 4 | City of S.F. v. Sessions | green | “the structure of section 10102 does not support the contention that 'maintain liaison' in section 10102(a)(2) provides more than a ministerial duty on the attorney general to maintain communication with other federal and state agencies.” | 4 |
| 5 | City of S.F. v. Sessions | green | “there is no dispute that certain challenged conditions in the fiscal year 2018 byrne jag program are functionally the same as the notice, access, and section 1373 certification con- ditions in the fiscal year 2017 byrne jag program at issue in the previous related litigation.” | 4 |
| 6 | City of Chi. v. Sessions | green | “all other applica- ble federal laws” | 4 |
| 7 | City of Chi. v. Sessions | green | “all other applicable federal law” | 4 |
| 8 | City of Chi. v. Sessions | green | “declare that all three immigration-related conditions for the fy 2017 byrne jag are unlawful.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.