Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McGee v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGee v. State Anchor | green | “specifically defined and well established” | 11 |
| 2 | Keehn v. State | green | “under the automobile exception, law enforcement officials may conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle if it is readily mobile and there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband.” | 9 |
| 3 | Keehn v. State | green | “readily mobile and there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband.” | 5 |
| 4 | Keehn v. State | green | “may conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle if it is readily mobile and there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband.” | 4 |
| 5 | Marcopoulos v. State | green | “when a search has been conducted without a warrant, the state carries the burden in a motion to suppress to establish the application of the exception for the requirement to obtain a warrant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.