Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Oken.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Oken Anchor | green | “(1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.” | 14 |
| 2 | Logitech Cargo, USA, Corp. v. JW Perry, Inc. | green | “the whole point of our jurisdiction and venue laws is not to hale defendants into foreign jurisdictions where they are not seeking affirmative relief.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sprint Corp. v. Telimagine, Inc. | green | “by exercising jurisdiction over sprint corp. when issuing the temporary injunction, the trial court implicitly denied spring corp.'s motion to dismiss.” | 3 |
| 4 | Estes v. Rodin | green | “the state's adjudication authority, principally protecting the liberty of the nonresident defendant-not the convenience of plaintiffs or third parties.” | 3 |
| 5 | Humphrey v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. | green | “the court never secured personal jurisdiction over humphrey and, thus, had no power over him. that being so, the court had no authority to direct humphrey to do anything.” | 3 |
| 6 | Youssef v. Zaitouni ex rel. R.Y. | green | “necessary before a defendant, either an individual or business entity, may be compelled to answer a claim brought in a court of law.” | 3 |
| 7 | Youssef v. Zaitouni ex rel. R.Y. | green | “simply cannot subvert the statutory requirements or the due process interests that they implicate.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.