Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Love Brooks v. Bryan Bledsoe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Love Brooks v. Bryan Bledsoe Anchor | green | “to the extent that brooks is suing the bop employees in their official capacities, his claim fails as actions against prison officials in their official capacities are considered actions against the united states, and bivens claims against the united states are barred by soverei…” | 17 |
| 2 | Lewal v. Ali | green | “an action against government officials in their official capacities constitutes an action against the united states; and bivens claims against the united states are barred by sovereign immunity, absent an explicit waiver.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.