Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “supported by substantial evidence.” | 12 |
| 2 | Lonergan v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services | green | “may not substitute its own judgment for that of the special master if the special master has considered all relevant factors, and has made no clear error of judgment.” | 10 |
| 3 | Lonergan v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services | green | “if the special master has considered all relevant factors, and has made no clear error of judgment.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.