Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Myra Furcron v. Mail Centers Plus, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myra Furcron v. Mail Centers Plus, LLC Anchor | green | “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 13 |
| 2 | Myra Furcron v. Mail Centers Plus, LLC | green | “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 7 |
| 3 | Lynette Christmas v. Harris County, Georgia | green | “courts are permitted to exercise their sound discretion in deciding which of the two prongs of the qualified immunity analysis should be addressed first.” | 4 |
| 4 | Thomas B. Ireland v. Bill Prummell | green | “qualified immunity protects government officials performing discretionary functions from civil trials . . . and from liability if their conduct violates no clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” | 4 |
| 5 | Clyde Anthony v. Georgia Department of Public Safety | green | “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.