Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 215 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mario Abreu v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mario Abreu v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI Anchor | green | “article iii of the united states constitution limits federal 'judicial power' to the adjudication of 'cases' or 'controversies.” | 46 |
| 2 | Mario Abreu v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI | green | “not presume that a conviction carries collateral consequences.” | 36 |
| 3 | Burkey v. Marberry | green | “it is not enough if 'collateral consequences proffered by the petitioner' amount to 'a possibility rather than a certainty or even a probability.” | 33 |
| 4 | Robert Defoy v. John M. McCullough Superintendent: Gerald J. Pappert, Att. General: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole | green | “for a case or controversy to exist, a petitioner, throughout each stage of the litigation, 'must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the respondent and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” | 28 |
| 5 | Burkey v. Marberry | green | “collateral consequences will be presumed when the petitioner is attacking his conviction while still serving the sentence imposed for that conviction and where the petitioner is attacking that portion of his sentence that is still being served.” | 25 |
| 6 | Burkey v. Marberry | green | “must 'address the issue of collateral consequences in terms of the likelihood that a favorable decision would redress the injury or wrong.” | 21 |
| 7 | Mario Abreu v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI | green | “collateral consequences will be presumed when the petitioner is attacking their conviction while still serving the sentence imposed for that conviction and . . . where they are attacking that portion of their sentence that is still being served.” | 12 |
| 8 | Toll Bros., Inc. v. Township of Readington | green | “for a case or controversy to exist, a petitioner, throughout each stage of the litigation, 'must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the respondent and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” | 11 |
| 9 | Lindaastuty v. Attorney General of the United States | green | “been deported and is, therefore, no longer in custody, the challenge to his detention is moot and the habeas petition must be dismissed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.