Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 214 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brooke Taskila v. Comm'r of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooke Taskila v. Comm'r of Social Security Anchor | green | “six thousand jobs in the united states fits comfortably within what this court and others have deemed 'significant” | 77 |
| 2 | Jerry Rudd v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the alj is charged with the responsibility of determining the rfc based on her evaluation of the medical and non-medical evidence.” | 32 |
| 3 | Charles Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “supported by the evidence in the case record, and must be sufficiently specific to make clear to any subsequent reviewers the weight the adjudicator gave to the treating source's medical opinion and the reasons for that weight.” | 31 |
| 4 | Ivory O. Miller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “is based upon sufficient medical data.” | 19 |
| 5 | Alice Sullivan v. Comm'r of Social Security | green | “work-related physical and mental activities in a work setting on a regular and continuing basis,” | 19 |
| 6 | Shepard v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “an rfc is an 'administrative finding,' and the final responsibility for determining an individual's rfc is reserved to the commissioner.” | 13 |
| 7 | Isaiah O'Banner v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, and Willie L. Smith v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare | green | “a finding supported by substantial evidence that a claimant has the vocational qualifications to perform specific jobs” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.