Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Calvi v. Knox County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calvi v. Knox County Anchor | green | “give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” | 17 |
| 2 | EPA v. Hernandez | green | “the requirements of rule 8(a)(2) are minimal-but 'minimal requirements are not tantamount to nonexistent requirements.” | 10 |
| 3 | Chiang v. Skeirik | green | “threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.