Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Dockery.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Dockery Anchor | green | “the accepted practice is to raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in post-conviction proceedings, rather than direct appeal.” | 13 |
| 2 | State v. Fair | green | “should the reviewing court determine that iac claims have been prematurely asserted on direct appeal, it shall dismiss those claims without prejudice to the defendant's right to reassert them during a subsequent mar proceeding.” | 9 |
| 3 | State v. Ware | green | “the accepted practice is to raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in post-conviction proceedings, rather than direct appeal.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Allen | green | “further development of the facts would be required before application of the strickland test.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.