Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Newton v. Standard Fire Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newton v. Standard Fire Insurance Anchor | green | “a complaint should not be dismissed for insufficiency unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” | 6 |
| 2 | Bueltel v. Lumber Mutual Insurance | green | “it is apparent that when a choice of law provision is included in a contract, the parties intend to make an exception to the presumptive rule that the contract is governed by the law of the place where it was made.” | 5 |
| 3 | Cooper v. Henderson | green | “deliberation, discussion, or conference upon the terms of a proposed agreement, or as the act of settling or arranging the terms of a bargain or sale.” | 4 |
| 4 | Cable Tel Services, Inc. v. Overland Contracting, Inc. | green | “court interprets a contract according to the intent of the parties to the contract.” | 4 |
| 5 | State Ex Rel. Cooper v. NCCS Loans, Inc. | green | “it is a 'paramount public policy of north carolina to protect north carolina resident borrowers through the application of north carolina interest laws.” | 4 |
| 6 | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Caccuro | green | “general jurisdiction may be asserted over a defendant even if the cause of action is unrelated to defendant's activities in the forum as long as there are sufficient continuous and systematic contacts between defendant and the forum state.” | 4 |
| 7 | Can Am South, LLC v. State, North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services | green | “any interested party shall have the right of immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person or property of the defendant . . . .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.