Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human Resources.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human Resources Anchor | green | “the 'whole record' test requires the reviewing court to examine all competent evidence (the 'whole record') in order to determine whether the agency decision is supported by 'substantial evidence.” | 16 |
| 2 | Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources | green | “substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind would regard as adequately supporting a particular conclusion.” | 8 |
| 3 | Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human Resources | green | “the process has been described as a twofold task: (1) determining whether the trial court exercised the appropriate scope of review and, if appropriate, (2) deciding whether the court did so properly.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.