Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Alston.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Alston Anchor | green | “an appellate court is not required to, and should not, assume error by the trial judge when none appears on the record before the appellate court.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Headen | green | “to allow for appellate review, the trial court must make specific findings of fact at each stage of the batson inquiry that it reaches.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Cofield | green | “must uphold the trial court's findings unless they are clearly erroneous.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Headen | green | “found only that there was not a prima facie showing made to establish any violations by the state for its exercise of peremptory challenges.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Headen | green | “specific findings of fact at each stage of the batson inquiry that it reaches.” | 4 |
| 6 | State v. Sanders | green | “at this point, the court does not find that the state's exercise of peremptory challenges has even reached the very low hurdle for making a prima facie claim yet. . . . the court has found at this point there's not a prima facie showing, and the court will deny the batson challe…” | 4 |
| 7 | State v. Sanders | green | “only on the information adduced at the batson inquiry.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.