Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Proctor v. LeClaire.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proctor v. LeClaire Anchor | green | “(1) that defendants deprived him of a cognizable interest in life, liberty, or property, (2) without affording him constitutionally sufficient process.” | 19 |
| 2 | Davis v. Barrett | green | “only if the discipline imposes an atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” | 6 |
| 3 | Davis v. Barrett | green | “the extent to which the conditions of the disciplinary segregation differ from other routine prison conditions” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.