Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Baker v. Department of Employment & Training Board of Review.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker v. Department of Employment & Training Board of Review Anchor | green | “reverse factual conclusions of administrative agencies only when they are totally devoid of competent evidentiary support in the record.” | 11 |
| 2 | Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. Berry | green | “sits as an appellate court with a limited scope of review” | 6 |
| 3 | Birchwood Realty, Inc. v. Grant | green | “correct deficiencies in the record and thus afford the litigants a meaningful review.” | 6 |
| 4 | Sakonnet Rogers, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Management Council | green | “findings of fact, if set forth in statutory language, shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the findings.” | 5 |
| 5 | Bernier v. Lombardi | green | “otherwise occasioned by error of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.