Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ayotte v. Gervasio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ayotte v. Gervasio Anchor | green | “must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact.” | 8 |
| 2 | Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. | green | “no material and triable issue of fact is presented” | 8 |
| 3 | Justinian Capital SPC Ex Rel. Blue Heron Segregated Portfolio v. WestLB AG | green | “mere conclusions, expressions of hope, or unsubstantiated allegations or assertions are insufficient” | 6 |
| 4 | Collado v. Jiacono | green | “facts are in dispute, where conflicting inferences may be drawn from the evidence, or where there are issues of credibility.” | 5 |
| 5 | Lopez v. Beltre | green | “determine whether material factual issues exist, not to resolve such issues.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.