Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 210 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. United States Anchor | green | “searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule.” | 49 |
| 2 | United States v. Knotts | green | “a person traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements from one place to another.” | 43 |
| 3 | United States v. Knotts | green | “a person travelling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements from one place to another.” | 34 |
| 4 | Davis v. United States | green | “evidence obtained during a search conducted in reasonable reliance on binding precedent is not subject to the exclusionary rule.” | 31 |
| 5 | United States v. Jones | green | “the government's installation of a gps device on a target's vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a 'search.” | 23 |
| 6 | New York v. Class | green | “the exterior of a car, of course, is thrust into the public eye, and thus to examine it does not constitute a 'search.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.