Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Arbitration Between Enlarged City School District & Troy Teachers Ass'n.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Arbitration Between Enlarged City School District & Troy Teachers Ass'n Anchor | green | “questions concerning compliance with a contractual step-by-step grievance process have been recognized as matters of procedural arbitrability to be resolved by the arbitrators, particularly in the absence of a very narrow arbitration clause or a provision expressly making compli…” | 7 |
| 2 | Mariano v. Town of Orchard Park | green | “first, a court must determine whether there is any statutory, constitutional or public policy prohibition against arbitration of the grievance” | 7 |
| 3 | Oram v. Capone | green | “a question of law appearing on the face of the record . . . that could not have been avoided by the opposing party if brought to that party's attention in a timely manner” | 5 |
| 4 | Pramco III, LLC v. Partners Trust Bank | green | “the fact that the . . . order contains language or reasoning that respondent deems adverse to its interests does not furnish a basis for standing to take a cross appeal” | 3 |
| 5 | In re the Arbitration between Haessig & Oswego City School District | green | “a determination of arbitrability is limited to 'whether there is a reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the cba” | 3 |
| 6 | Mariano v. Town of Orchard Park | green | “issues concerning respondent's relationship to retired employees, issues concerning whether retirees are covered by the grievance procedure, and issues concerning whether the clauses of the cba support the grievance are matters involving the scope of the substantive contractual …” | 3 |
| 7 | Livingston v. State | neutral | “employees in the bargaining unit” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.