Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wooten v. State of Texas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wooten v. State of Texas Anchor | green | “a surveyor could go upon the land and mark out the land designated.” | 12 |
| 2 | Morrow v. Shotwell | green | “to be sufficient, the writing must furnish within itself, or by reference to some other existing writing, the means or data by which the land to be conveyed may be identified with reasonable certainty.” | 10 |
| 3 | Slusher v. Streater | green | “great deference must be given to the judge's determination of the witnesses' credibility and the weight of their testimony.” | 5 |
| 4 | Wooten v. State of Texas | green | “a surveyor could go upon the land and mark out the land designated” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.