Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Travis RIPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travis RIPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “the alj has a duty to develop the facts fully and fairly relating to an applicant's claim for disability benefits.” | 16 |
| 2 | Brown v. Apfel | green | “may not reweigh the evidence in the record, nor try the issues de novo, nor substitute its judgment for that of the alj, even if the evidence preponderates against the alj's decision.” | 8 |
| 3 | Joyce Jones v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner | green | “a court will reverse the alj's decision as not supported by substantial evidence if the claimant shows that (1) the alj failed to fulfill his duty to develop the record adequately and (2) that failure prejudiced the plaintiff.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.