Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Bravo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Bravo Anchor | green | “by substituting the amended guideline range for the originally applied guideline range, and then using that new base level to determine what ultimate sentence it would have imposed.” | 14 |
| 2 | Dillon v. United States | green | “by its terms, 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a sentencing or resentencing proceeding.” | 12 |
| 3 | United States v. Wayne Thomas Charles Vautier, A.K.A. Ian Garfield McKinnon Etc. | green | “as long as the record as a whole demonstrates that the pertinent factors were taken into account by the district court.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.